The two of you have some fundamental differences in what you value. Although both of you value logic and reason, looking at things from an objective viewpoint, you tend to disagree on the goal of your analysis. Your counterpart fundamentally is an innovator, while you are more focused on maintaining the status quo.
You are a traditionalist who likely will find your counterpart’s innovations unnecessary, if not outright ridiculous. You like to put faith in the past, and trust what has worked for many generations before you. You appreciate rules and feel comforted, rather than restricted, by institutions and traditions. Rather than being excited by the unknown, you are wary of striking out into new territory. For this reason, you are inclined to stick with what you know and follow established procedures and processes.
On the other hand, your counterpart seeks out ways to shake up the system and make things newer, faster, and better. They believe that everything can be analyzed, dissected, re-engineered, and improved. They most likely love science, technology, and innovations in business. To them, the future is an exciting place, and they may enjoy fantasizing about what the world will be like in 20, 50, or even a thousand years.
But conflict is not inevitable, and you each have something truly valuable to offer one another. For you, your partner can help you see where change really is needed, and how to learn to embrace it. Their excitement and confidence in times of uncertainty can show you that what is new is not always unwelcome, and progress can be (and often is) a good thing.
On the flip side, you can offer your partner a stern reality check for their sometimes pie-in-the-sky ideas. Let's face it, although your counterpart has some wonderfully innovative ideas, they're often mixed in with a few half-baked duds. You are uniquely positioned to help them figure out which is which.