TypeFinder® Personality Test 的评价
Looking for the best personality test? Based on Myers and Briggs' 16 types, Truity's TypeFinder personality test is the highest rated personality type test available online, with an average customer rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars. Truity's TypeFinder test meets the highest standards for accuracy, with millions users contributing to our dataset and an extensive history of research into reliability and validity.
作者:TONYA
LOVE THE RESULTS!
作者:Cinthya
Good description but need more advice
作者:Kate Smith
Great synopsis. I'd be interested to learn how gender effects role perceptions/ expectations.
作者:William Fowler
I am very impressed with the length and thoroughness of the report.
作者:andrew wanzenberg
The Truity test was remarkably accurate and nuanced. Indeed, I worked as an engineer and technical writer.
I have a minor disagreement with the descriptions in one small section - Objective vs Subjective. Taking into account the needs of others is not what distinguishes objective from subjective. Objective decisions also take into account the needs of others, but they are not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Also, "detached" and "impersonal" have negative connotations. Detached implies indifferent. Impersonal also means 'not existing as a person' or 'having no personality.'
作者:Adam
Enjoyed this exercise and am excited to us the information to both lean on my strengths and improve my weaknesses.
作者:TMaddox
This was spot on with my personality. I enjoy taking these types of test because I can always use the info to become the best version of me.
作者:Imane
very helpful ! thank you
作者:John Gentry
As a professional, I was surprised at how accurate this was. The additional information is also informative. and helpful when learning about one's decision-making styles.
作者:Sandera
After reading the results, I am still processing them. There were quite a few surprising and therefore interesting details. I have done personality tests before but none of them were as thorough as this one.
